1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA & SMT.VIDYA SELVAMONY, MEMBER R.F.A.No.161/2020 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.8150/2025) BETWEEN: 1 . SRI. A P VASUDEV AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS S/O A.M.POOVAIAH, R/AT FLAT NO. 105, SUNBEAM APARTMENT, NO.46, DAVIS ROAD, RICHARDS TOWN, BANGALORE-560084. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. ANISH ACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . GOWRAMMA W/O SRI. SRINIVAS AGED BOUT 60 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 402, 2 36TH CROSS, V BLOCK, HBR LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560043. ...RESPONDENT (BY.SRIKANTH S., ADVOCATE) RFA FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT NA DECREE DATED 05.09.2019 PASSED IN OS.NO.8513/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. CONCILIATION ORDER A memo is filed by learned counsel for the appellant for withdrawal. Memo reads as under: 3 “Undersigned counsel for petitioner most humbly submits as follows: The petitioner has filed the above case against the respondent, on 2nd January 2024 this Hon’ble Court has passed conditional order that, the appellant has to deposit sum of Rs.5 Lakh with interest at the rate of 12% within a four week, but the appellant has failed to comply the order of this Hon’ble Court, however the interim order has vacated, after that the respondent had filed commercial execution No.509/2025 (CCH-86), the said commercial matter had referred to mediation, accordingly the matter had settled in mediation center, today the matter had listed before Commercial Court for reporting the settlement, hence be pleased to the dispose the above matter accordingly in the interest of justice and equity.” Placing the memo on record, appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER KAV