HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8299 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Sri Rahul Sahai, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that during pendency of the instant petition, the application for temporary injunction has been decided finally by the trial court. 2. Sri Apurva Hajela, learned counsel for the respondent also submitted that trial court has finally decided the application for temporary injunction. 3. In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is dismissed with liberty to challenge the order passed on application for temporary injunction before appropriate forum. September 15, 2025 C.Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Sahai, Umair Mahmood Counsel for Respondent(s) : Apurva Hajela (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Dilshad Ali And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Swistank Warehouse Private Ltd. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad