Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52698 WP No. 18697 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 18697 OF 2025 (S-R) BETWEEN:
SRI MURUGAN S/O PERIYASWAMY, AGED 44 YEARS, WORKING AT SATHYA HARISHCHANDRAGHAT ELECTRIC CREMATORIUM HELPER, MALLESHWARAM, RAJAJINAGAR WEST, BENGALURU-560 003 …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA B V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU -560 002.
Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52698 WP No. 18697 of 2025
2.
MEDICAL OFFICER HEALTH, MALLESHWARAM DIVISION, BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BENGALURU -560003 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN KUMAR B.M. ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B L SANJEEV, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO REGULARIZE THE SERVICE OF THE PETITIONER FROM THAT DAY ON WHICH THE PETITIONER COMPLETED 10 YEARS OF SERVICE.
B) PETITIONER IS ENTITLED TO FIXATION OF THEIR SALARIES AS SUCH REGULARIZATION AS OBTAINING TO A PERMANENT EMPLOYEE FROM THAT DATE THEY COMPLETE 10 YEARS OF SERVICE, AND HE IS ENTITLE FOR ARREARS OF SALARY, AND ALSO THE PERIOD OF SERVICE SHALL BE TREATED FOR ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS, THAT WOULD FOLLOW FROM SUCH REGULARIZATION. C) THE SERVICE RENDERED BY THE PETITIONER THROUGH AND SHALL BE COUNTED FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINATION OF PENSION AND ALL OTHER INCIDENTAL TERMINAL BENEFITS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52698 WP No. 18697 of 2025
ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking for a mandamus directing the respondents to consider his representation vide Annexure 'B' seeking for regularization of his service; the said representation was submitted on 28.05.2025.
2. Despite submission of the representation by the petitioner, the respondents have not taken any steps to pass an order on the said representation. Hence this writ petition.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that if a reasonable time is granted to the respondents, respondents will consider the representation of the petitioner vide annexure "B" and pass an appropriate
order in accordance with law.
4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondents, I pass the following
order:
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52698 WP No. 18697 of 2025
ORDER (I) The Writ Petition is disposed of. (II) The respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 28.05.2025 vide Annexure 'B' and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
RK CT:KHV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8