COUNTY DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. (CDPL) v. SAMARTH AD PROTEX PVT. LTD. (SAPL) & ANR.
CS(COMM)/83/2021 · 2025-07-21
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8099 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8099 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~O-5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 83/2021
COUNTY DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. (CDPL) .....Plaintiff
Through: Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advocate.
versus
SAMARTH AD PROTEX PVT. LTD. (SAPL) .....Defendant
Through: Mr.Abhishek Bansal, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R %
21.07.2025
I.A. 17111/2025 (under Section 151 of CPC)
1. Having heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff and for the reasons stated in the application, the same stands allowed.
2. The application stands disposed.
CS(COMM) 83/2021
1.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties submit that the matter stood settled and the terms of settlement have been recorded vide Memorandum of Settlement (MoS) dated 28.10.2024.
2.
Order XXIII, Rule 3 authorises the Court to pass a decree on a compromise wherein the parties to the dispute have made an arrangement to settle the dispute. It has been comprehensively stated in the provision that the settlement arrived at should meet the essentials laid down therein, This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2025 at 12:04:17
namely, (i) the compromise is lawful (ii) it is reduced in writing (iii) it is duly signed by the parties arriving at the compromise.
3. The settlement has been agreed upon without fear or coercion and the parties appear to have entered into the settlement agreement on their own volition.
4. The Court is satisfied that the settlement has been arrived at between the parties following due procedure and meeting the essentials specified
Order XXIII, Rule 3. Therefore, the parties shall be bound by the aforesaid settlement agreement.
5. Since, the application bearing I.A. 17111/2025 has already been allowed, the civil suit stands dismissed as withdrawn and the same is
directed to be decreed in terms of the settlement agreement.
6. The Registry is directed to draw-up a decree sheet.
7. The civil suit along with the pending application(s), if any, stands
disposed of.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JULY 21, 2025 Nc/sph This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2025 at 12:04:17