- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44242 WP No. 1541 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO. 1541 OF 2016 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI SUBBANNA @ SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, SON OF LATE NARAYANAPPA @ CHIKKANARAYANAPPA 2. SRI CHIKKASUBBANNA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA @ CHIKKANARAYANAPPA 3. SRI NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA @ CHIKKANARAYANAPPA 4. SRI RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, @ CHIKKANARAYANAPPA 5. SRI HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, @ CHIKKANARAYANAPPA 6. SRI MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA @ CHIKKANARAYANAPPA Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44242 WP No. 1541 of 2016 ALL ARE RESIDING AT AMRUTHAHALLI, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560 092 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. N MOHAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MULTISTORIED BUILDING BANGALORE-1 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE TAHASILDAR BANGALORE EAST TALUK, K.R PURAM, BANGALORE-560 092 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NEELAKANTAPPA K PUJAR, HCGP FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION 104 OF KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT CAN BE INVOKED BY THE RESPONDENTS WITHIN REASONABLE TIME OR AT ATLEAST WITHIN 30 YEARS FROM THE DATE OF LOSING POSSESSION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44242 WP No. 1541 of 2016 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER This Court vide order dated 10.10.2025 granted time to the learned counsel for the petitioners to take necessary steps to bring the legal representatives of deceased petitioner Nos.1, 3, 4 and 5. However, till today, learned counsel for the petitioners has not taken any steps to that effect. 2. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call. Though the matter is of the year 2016, it seems that the petitioners are not interested to pursue the Writ Petition. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3