Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80976 (PNJ)

RAVINDER v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/38287/2025 · 2025-07-25

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-38287- 214 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Ravinder State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Baldev S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Mayuri Lakhanpal Kalia, DAG Haryana. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer The jurisdiction of this Court BNSS for grant of regular to the petitioner in case FIR No. dated 25.10.2024 registered at Police Station 2. Con On behalf of the petitioner At the outset, compromise has been entered into between the petitioner and the complainant, is evident from Annexure P wherein he has submitted -2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of Decision : 25.07.2025 VERSUS State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Mr. Baldev S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Mayuri Lakhanpal Kalia, DAG Haryana. -.- SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL) Prayer The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Section 483 BNSS for grant of regular to the petitioner in case FIR No. 25.10.2024 (Annexure P-1) under Section registered at Police Station Khol, District Rewari Contentions On behalf of the petitioner At the outset, Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a compromise has been entered into between the petitioner and the complainant, is evident from Annexure P-2, which is an affidavit wherein he has submitted that he has nothing due towards the petitioner. -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38287-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 25.07.2025 ....Petitioner ....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Mr. Baldev S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Mayuri Lakhanpal Kalia, DAG Haryana. has been invoked under Section 483 BNSS for grant of regular to the petitioner in case FIR No.364 1) under Section 303, 318(4) of BNS 2023 Khol, District Rewari, in the interest of justice. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a compromise has been entered into between the petitioner and the complainant, n affidavit of the complainant – Manish he has nothing due towards the petitioner. has been invoked under Section 483 364 303, 318(4) of BNS 2023, Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a compromise has been entered into between the petitioner and the complainant, as Manish, TRIPTI SAINI 2025.07.25 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-38287- On behalf of the State On the other hand, learned State counsel has produced the custody certificate of the petitioner today in Court, which is taken on record. dismissal of the instant petition on the ground that complainant whereby by the petitioner on the pretext of part time job. On behalf of the complainant Ms on behalf of the complainant and filed his Power of Attorney, which is taken on record. She also admits the factum of compromise entered into between the petitioner and the complainant. 4. Anal Be that as it may, considering the fact that a compromise has been entered into between the petitioner and the complainant, as is evident from Annexure P-2, which is also admitted by learned counsel for the complainant; the petitioner has suffered incarceration of with the fact that investigation is complete, challan stands presented to Court on 12.03.2025, charges have prosecution witnesses, only 01 witness has been examined so far, which is suffice for this Court to infer that the conclusion of trial shall take considerable time and detaining the petitioner behind the purpose. -2025 (O&M) On behalf of the State On the other hand, learned State counsel has produced the custody certificate of the petitioner today in Court, which is taken on record. dismissal of the instant petition on the ground that complainant whereby the complainant has been duped of the amount of Rs.96546/ by the petitioner on the pretext of part time job. On behalf of the complainant Ms. Chandan Preet Kaur Ahluwalia on behalf of the complainant and filed his Power of Attorney, which is taken on also admits the factum of compromise entered into between the petitioner and the complainant. Analysis Be that as it may, considering the fact that a compromise has been entered into between the petitioner and the complainant, as is evident from , which is also admitted by learned counsel for the complainant; the petitioner has suffered incarceration of 06 months and with the fact that investigation is complete, challan stands presented to Court on , charges have been framed on 03.04.2025 prosecution witnesses, only 01 witness has been examined so far, which is suffice for this Court to infer that the conclusion of trial shall take considerable time and detaining the petitioner behind the bars for an indefinite period would serve no -2- On the other hand, learned State counsel has produced the custody certificate of the petitioner today in Court, which is taken on record. She seek dismissal of the instant petition on the ground that fraud has been committed on the the complainant has been duped of the amount of Rs.96546/ by the petitioner on the pretext of part time job. uwalia, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant and filed his Power of Attorney, which is taken on also admits the factum of compromise entered into between the Be that as it may, considering the fact that a compromise has been entered into between the petitioner and the complainant, as is evident from , which is also admitted by learned counsel for the complainant; the months and 02 days, as of now added with the fact that investigation is complete, challan stands presented to Court on 03.04.2025, wherein out of total prosecution witnesses, only 01 witness has been examined so far, which is suffice for this Court to infer that the conclusion of trial shall take considerable time and bars for an indefinite period would serve no On the other hand, learned State counsel has produced the custody seeks fraud has been committed on the the complainant has been duped of the amount of Rs.96546/- , Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant and filed his Power of Attorney, which is taken on also admits the factum of compromise entered into between the Be that as it may, considering the fact that a compromise has been entered into between the petitioner and the complainant, as is evident from , which is also admitted by learned counsel for the complainant; the days, as of now added with the fact that investigation is complete, challan stands presented to Court on , wherein out of total 07 prosecution witnesses, only 01 witness has been examined so far, which is suffice for this Court to infer that the conclusion of trial shall take considerable time and bars for an indefinite period would serve no TRIPTI SAINI 2025.07.25 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-38287- 5. Relief In view of the discussions made hereinabove, the petitioner is hereby directed to be released on regular bail on him furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the In the afore However, it is made clear that anything stated hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. July 25, 2025 tripti Whether speaking/non Whether reportable -2025 (O&M) Relief: In view of the discussions made hereinabove, the petitioner is hereby directed to be released on regular bail on him furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. In the afore-said terms, the present petition is hereby allowed. However, it is made clear that anything stated hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No -3- In view of the discussions made hereinabove, the petitioner is hereby directed to be released on regular bail on him furnishing bail and surety bonds to trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. said terms, the present petition is hereby allowed. However, it is made clear that anything stated hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE speaking : Speaking : Yes/No In view of the discussions made hereinabove, the petitioner is hereby directed to be released on regular bail on him furnishing bail and surety bonds to However, it is made clear that anything stated hereinabove shall not (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) TRIPTI SAINI 2025.07.25 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document