$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 131/2024 CM APPL. 5307/2024 PURSHOTTAM DASS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, and Mrs. Rimpy Gupta Advocates (thru VC) versus ANKUR CHUGH & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ankur Mahindro, Ms Divya Mishra, Advs. for R-1 (thru VC) Mr. Arun Baali, Ms. Arisha Ahmad and Mr. Vaibhav Kapoor, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL O R D E R % 28.04.2025 1. It transpires that vacant possession of the premises in question has already been given. 2. Remedies for extension were sought by the respondent till the Supreme Court; however, they have been unsuccessful and they have handed over vacant possession of the property. 3. As regards the use and occupation charges, counsel for petitioner states that they have been paid and there is no outstanding dues with respect to the same. 4. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. 5. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J APRIL 28, 2025/sm/na This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2025 at 12:11:03