Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80967 (KAR)

SRI M G MANJUNATH v. CHEIF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

WP/3584/2022 · 2025-10-27

R Nataraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42465 WP No. 3584 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 3584 OF 2022 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. M.G. MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O LATE M.B. GURULINGAIAH MAYAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S. KALYAN BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CHEIF EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYAT RAMANAGARA - 562 159. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA SUB DIVISION RAMANAGARA - 562 159. 3. SMT. KHADER BI AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS W/O LATE IBRAHIM SAHEB MAYAGANAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST KASABA HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 128. 4. SMT. NAHEEMA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS C/O ARIF @ LATE IBRAHIM SAB MAYAGANAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST KASAB HOBLI, RAMANAGAR TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 128. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42465 WP No. 3584 of 2022 (BY SRI. M.S. DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. B. BOPANNA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R2; VIDE ORDER DATED 01.12.2022, NOTICE TO R3 AND R4 IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DATED 5.1.2019 ISSUED BY THE R-1 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C AND THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT THERETO AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 10.10.2025 seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. The memo reads as under: "The petitioner does not press the above writ petition and as such the petitioner seeks leave of this Hon'ble Court to dismiss/withdraw the above writ petition without any order of cost in the interest of justice and equity." In view of the memo, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1