Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80953 (ALL)

RAMESH CHANDRA v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/25289/2025 · 2025-07-31

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:129390 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25289 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramesh Chandra Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel as to the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that the order impugned is appealable under Section 35 (2) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. In view of the said fact, no writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India lies. Writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. However, it is open to the petitioners to file a appeal before the appellate authority within 15 days. In case, the said appeal is filed within the period mentioned above, appellate authority shall not go into the question of limitation and decide the same strictly in accordance with law. Order Date :- 1.8.2025 SK Goswami Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad