DAILY LOK ADALAT FAO-4006-2017 SURESH KUMAR V/S GHANSHAM DASS AND ORS Present: None Mr. Rajneesh Malhotra, for * * * Vide order dated appellant to appear in person. As per office report, the notice stands served. There is no representation on behalf of notice. We feel that the appellant has lost interest in the matter. File be consigned to the records with liberty to the appellant to get it revived after moving an appropriate application in this regard. Copy of this order be January 23, 2025 neelam DAILY LOK ADALAT 2017 SURESH KUMAR V/S GHANSHAM DASS AND ORS None for the appellant. Mr. Rajneesh Malhotra, Advocate or SBI GIC-respondent No.3. * * * Vide order dated 19.012.2024, notice was issued to the appellant to appear in person. As per office report, the notice stands served. There is no representation on behalf of We feel that the appellant has lost interest in the matter. File be consigned to the records with liberty to the appellant to get it revived after moving an appropriate application in this regard. Copy of this order be sent to the appellant at his address. January 23, 2025 BENCH NO.5 510 SURESH KUMAR V/S GHANSHAM DASS AND ORS Advocate 19.012.2024, notice was issued to the As per office report, the notice stands served. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant despite We feel that the appellant has lost interest in the matter. File be consigned to the records with liberty to the appellant to get it revived after moving an appropriate application in this regard. sent to the appellant at his address. (Jitendra Chauhan) PRESIDENT (R.P. Nagrath) MEMBER 510 19.012.2024, notice was issued to the despite File be consigned to the records with liberty to the appellant to (Jitendra Chauhan) (R.P. Nagrath) MEMBER Neelam Kumari 2025.01.24 04:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document