Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:129158 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8220 of 2025 Petitioner :- Piyush Chaudhari Respondent :- Ajay Narayan Chaudhari And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rama Goel Bansal,Shalini Goel Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "Direct the court of Civil Judge (S.D.)/F.T.C. Allahabad to decide the interim injunction application i.e. paper no. 6-C in O.S. no. 1043 of 2015 (Piyush Chaudhari Vs. Ajay Narayan Chaudhari and others), pending before the court of Civil Judge (S.D.)/F.T.C., within a stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2015 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.)/F.T.C. Allahabad to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 1.8.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad