Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52681 WP No. 10393 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 10393 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
SMT SHARADAMMA W/O. SRI. RAMAPPA REDDY.
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS.
R/O. HALANAYAKANAHALLI, CARMELARAM BANGALORE SOUTH BANGALORE-560 035 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARSHITH C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK KORAMANGALA BRANCH, NO. 12. MPD TOWER, INDUSTRIAL MAIN ROAD, KORAMANGALA, 5TH BLOCK, BENGALURU-560 095 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER
2.
M/S. S AND G METAL BUILDING SOLUTIONS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., HAVING ITS OFFICE AT OLD NO.21, NEW NO.74/2A, K.R. GARDEN, 8TH BLOCK, (OPP) NDDB, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560 095 REPRESENTED BY ITS
Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52681 WP No. 10393 of 2025
MANAGING DIRECTORS, MR. SUDHAKAR R.
MRS. GEETHA V.
3.
MR. SUDHAKAR RAMAIAH REDDY DIRECTOR M/S. S AND G METAL BUILDING SOLUTIONS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., OFFICE AT OLD NO.21, NEW NO.74/2A, K.R. GARDEN, 8TH BLOCK, (OPP) NDDB, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE – 560 095
4.
MRS. GEETHA V.
NO. 696, GEETHASUDHA NILAYA 2ND A MAIN ROAD, 8TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE – 560 095 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.K.SHIVARAM, ADVOCATE SRI.NAGENDRAKUMAR M.K., ADVOCATE FOR C/R4 NOTICE TO R2 AND R3 ARE DEFERRED V/O/ DATED: 29/08/2025)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE MORTGAGE DEED DATED: 21.07.2014 AT ANNEXURE-D EXECUTED BY R-2 AND 3 IN FAVOUR OF R-1 AGAINST THE PROPERTY NO.1 OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AS THE SAME IS NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52681 WP No. 10393 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to avail the alternative remedies available to the petitioner.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the petitioner to avail remedies under law.
i. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 75