101 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2691-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision : 09.09.2025 HAVAL SINGH AND ORS .... Petitioners VERSUS ANAND MOHAN SHARAN, IAS AND ORS .... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Ms. Maninee, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Addl. AG Haryana for respondents No.1 and 3. Mr. Siddhanth Arora, Advocate for Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for respondent No.2. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 3 has informed that a speaking order has since been passed and the claim of the petitioners stands rejected. 2. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 3, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners states that the petitioners do not wish to press the present contempt petition and seek permission to withdraw the same with liberty to avail their remedies as available in law. 3. Dismissed as not pressed with the liberty aforesaid. Rule stands discharged. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. 09.09.2025 (ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2025.09.10 09:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment