Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31608 WP No. 23158 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 23158 OF 2025 (LR)
BETWEEN:
SRI SUBBAYYA C. @ SUBBAIAH C., S/O SRI. CHENNARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT 9-WARD, BYPASS ROAD, MANDIBELE RASTE, VIJAYAPURA, BENGALURU – 562 135 …PETITIONER (BY MS. KRISHIKA VAISHNAV, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. A. MAHESH CHOWDHARY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIKASA SOUDHA DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 001 REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION PODIUM BLOCK VISHWESHWARAIAH TOWER DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU – 560 001
3.
THE TAHSILDAR DEVANAHALLI TALUK DEVANAHALLI
Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31608 WP No. 23158 of 2025
BENGALURU – 562 110 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER BEARING NO. LRF. SR (DEV) 4/2011-12 (OLD NO. LRF.SR (DEV) 148/1989-90), DATED 07.09.2016, PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2, VIDE ANNEXURE-A AS BEING ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL AND WITHOUT APPLICATION OF MIND AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 14.08.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition while submitting that the previous owner of the property against whom proceedings were initiated may be permitted to file a petition questioning the impugned order passed by the Assistant Commissioner.
2. The submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is placed on record.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31608 WP No. 23158 of 2025
3. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn while reserving liberty to the vendor of the petitioner to raise a challenge to the impugned order.
4. Office is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order and the original documents, if any, to the petitioner while retaining a copy for records.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE JT/- CT:UR