Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
7 ss 25.08.2025 WPA 2374 of 2025 Tapan Ghosh Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Santanu Maji … … for the petitioner Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there is a typographical error in the order dated 11th August, 2025 and he prays for correction of the same. On perusal of the order dated 11th August, 2025 it is revealed that in the second paragraph fourth line instead of “Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner claims intra-district transfer from one school to another school on medical ground of his spouse. The petitioner has submitted his representation dated January 8, 2025 at page 33 to the writ petition, but the same has not been considered.” it should be read as
““Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner claims intra-district transfer from one school to another school on medical ground of his son. The petitioner has submitted his representation dated January 8, 2025 at page 33 to the writ petition, but the same has not been considered.” The other portion of the order dated 11th August, 2025 shall remain the same.
(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.) 2