Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80882 (KAR)

SRI. MANCHAIAH v. UNION BANK OF INDIA SC/ST EMPLOYEES

WP/20615/2023 · 2025-10-09

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39775 WP NO.20615 OF 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.20615 OF 2023 (GM-KSR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MANCHAIAH S/O SRI. GIRIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O NO.414/4, 9TH MAIN, CHENNAMMANAKERE ACCHUKATTU, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 085. 2. SRI. PALANI RAJ G. S/O LATE N. GOVINDASAWAMY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O NO.48/1A, 3RD FLOOR, 2ND CROSS, 3RD MAIN, VENUGOPALASWAMY LAYOUT, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 047. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HARISCHANDRA M., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. UNION BANK OF INDIA SC/ST EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION KARNATAKA, AFFILIATED TO ALL INDIA UNION BANK SC/ST EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, (REGISTERED NO.MH/131/2022) C/O UNION BANK OF INDIA, VIJAYAPURA MAIN BRANCH, VIJAYAPURA - 560 101. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SRI. P.B. BARADDI. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39775 WP NO.20615 OF 2023 2. UNION BANK OF INDIA SC/ST EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION KARNATAKA, AFFILIATED TO ALL INDIA UNION BANK SC/ST EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, (REGISTERED NO.MH/131/2022) C/O UNION BANK OF INDIA, SERVICE BRANCH, BANK HOUSE, CAR STREET, MANGALURU - 575 001. REP. BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, SRI. KRISHNA MURTHY D. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DATED 10TH AUGUST, 2023 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-A IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER There is no representation for petitioners. 2. This petition is of the year-2023 and listed for sixth time for non-compliance of office objections. 3. Despite having been granted sufficient time, learned counsel for petitioners failed to comply with the office objections. This non-compliance by the petitioners would - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39775 WP NO.20615 OF 2023 indicate that the petitioners have no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter. 4. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18