Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80875 (ORI)

DR.NIRLIPATA DASH v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/36401/2025 · 2025-12-19

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.36401 of 2025 Dr. Nirlipta Dash …. Petitioner Mr. P.K. Nanda, Adv. -versus- Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation & Ors. …. Opposite Parties COROM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 19.12.2025 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “Under these facts and circumstances, it is most humbly prayed therefore, that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to direct opp.party no-1 to issue NOC in favour of the petitioner immediately enabling her to pursue three- year clinical fellowship programme in the specialty of Glaucoma commencing from 1ª January 2026 and has to join at Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, where she has been selected in the process of selection and has been directed to join the programme on 01.01.2026 at annexure-3. Or in the alternative pass any other order/orders as deem fit and proper in this case, p. 2 p. 2 And for the said act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner state that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.1 vide Annexure-4 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-4 in accordance with law within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Jyoti