2025:UHC:5199 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/1082/2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Karan Anand, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. V.S. Pal and Mr. N.S. Kanyal, learned Assistant Government Advocates for the State. 3. The present applicant ‘Ujjawal Sharma, S/o Vishal Kumar Sharma, is praying for regular bail in relation to First Information Report dated 25.03.2025 bearing FIR No. 58 of 2025 P.S. Premnagar, District Dehradun, which was lodged against seven persons in which the applicant has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 191(2), 191(3), 351(3), 324(5), 352 of BNS, 2023 and Section 3, 25 and 27 of Arms Act. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated, which is evident from the fact that the complainant himself seen the entire incident and he has disclosed the name of seven persons in the FIR, but the name of the applicant has not been disclosed and during investigation the complainant discloses the name of the applicant. 5. He further submits that the present applicant has no previous criminal history and is languishing in jail since 27.03.2025 and is pursuing BCA. 6. Mr. V.S. Pal, learned A.G.A. have not disputed this fact that the applicant is not named in the FIR and has no previous criminal history. 7. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties, this court is of the view that since the applicant is a student and pursuing BCA and is a young person of 20 years old and has no previous criminal history and is languishing in jail since 27.03.2025 and further is not named in the FIR, therefore, the applicant 2025:UHC:5199 deserves for bail. 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant ‘Ujjawal Sharma’ be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 10. It is made clear that after being released on bail the applicant is directed to cooperate with the investigation, failing which the prosecution is free to move application for cancellation of bail. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 20.06.2025. SKS 2025:UHC:5199