Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8086 (CHH)

SAMADHAN KHALVE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/502/2025 · 2025-02-07

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:7007 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 502 of 2025 1 - Samadhan Khalve S/o Arjun Chagannath Khalve Aged About 24 Years R/o Shankar Maharaj Basahat Satara Road Shambhajinagar Dhankadwadi, P.S. Sahkar Nagar District Pune, Maharashtra. 2 - Jatin Bole S/o Madhukar Bole Aged About 24 Years R/o Shankar Maharaj Basahat Mahalakshmi Store Jawal Dhankadwadi, P.S. Sahkar Nagar District Pune Maharashtra. 3 - Mahadev Bariha S/o Vinod Bariha Aged About 28 Years R/o Badesh Pali P.S. Melchamuda Sahla District Bargad, Odisha. ... Petitioners versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House OfÏcer, Mandir Hasaud, District – Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent For Petitioner : None For Respondent/State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 07.02.2025 1. This is an ofÏce reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 30.07.2024, passed in MCRC No. 4143 of 2024, while allowing the bail to the petitioners, namely, Samadhan Khalve, Jatin Bole, and Mahadev Bariha , had expressed its trust that the trial Court should make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of 06 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 3. The learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Raipur, District – Raipur (C.G.) through the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Raipur, District – Raipur (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 29.01.2025 has requested for grant of 4 months time for concluding the trial. 4. It transpires from perusal of the PUD, that in this case, the trial is fixed for recording of prosecution witnesses have been done, and the statement of accused persons are yet to be recorded, but due to absence of the accused persons the arrest warrants have been issued against them . Hence, trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion. Hence, he prays for grant of 4 months time for concluding the trial. 5. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of three months from today. 6. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 7. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar