- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39510 WP No. 21592 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.21592 OF 2023 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. DHANALAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/AT VIDYANAGARA GENERAL HOSTEL BACK SIDE, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577201. 2. NARAYANA MURTHY S/O HANUMANTHAPPA AGED 52 YEARS, R/AT NEAR BEHIND GENERAL HOSTEL VIDYANAGARA SHIVAMOGGA-577201. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ASHOK KUMAR A., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SAMEER S.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE BY KOTE P.S. SHIVAMOGGA SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577201. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT SHIVAMOGGA-577201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA) Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39510 WP No. 21592 of 2023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 02.09.2023; DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO INVESTIGATE AND SUBMIT CHARGE SHEET UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF IPC AND UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES SC AND ST ACT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioners have sought for consideration of the representation dated 02.09.2023 (Annexure-F). - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39510 WP No. 21592 of 2023 4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the averments made in the representation at Annexure-F would indicate that, certain allegations have been made with regard to factual aspects of the matter. It is also forthcoming from Annexure-D and Annexure-A that Kote Police Station, Shimoga has already registered Crime No.90 of 2023 and Crime No.5 of 2023, respectively and in that view of the matter, I am of the opinion that, no interference is called for in this writ petition to direct the respondents to consider the representation. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19