Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80849 (PNJ)

ANNU AND ANOTHER v. MANJEET

CRR(F)/804/2019 · 2025-05-27

Namit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 228 Annu and another Manjeet CORAM : HON'BLE MR Present: Mr. for petitioners. None for the respondent. *** NAMIT KUMAR 1. The present the impugned order dated 26.07.2019 passed by the learned Principal Judge (Family Court), Rohtak vide which the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. qua petitioner No.1 has been dismissed and qua petitioner No.2, it was observed that petitioner No.2 respondent to pay an amount of Rs.3000/ 2. Learned counsel for Section 125 Cr.P.C. has been disposed of by the learned Princip Court, Rohtak vide order dated 05.12.2022 and therefore, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Disposed of, as having become infructuous. May 27, 2025 Pankaj* IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR Date of Decision: Annu and another Versus HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Mohit Rathee, Advocate for petitioners. None for the respondent. *** NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioners the impugned order dated 26.07.2019 passed by the learned Principal Judge (Family Court), Rohtak vide which the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. qua petitioner No.1 has been dismissed and qua petitioner No.2, it was observed that petitioner No.2 is entitled for maintenance from both parents and directed the respondent to pay an amount of Rs.3000/- per month only. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. has been disposed of by the learned Princip Court, Rohtak vide order dated 05.12.2022 and therefore, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. Disposed of, as having become infructuous. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR(F)-804-2019 Date of Decision:27.05.2025 ... Petitioner ... Respondent NAMIT KUMAR revision petition has been filed by the petitioners against the impugned order dated 26.07.2019 passed by the learned Principal Judge (Family Court), Rohtak vide which the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. qua petitioner No.1 has been dismissed and qua petitioner No.2, it was observed that is entitled for maintenance from both parents and directed the per month only. the petitioners submits that the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. has been disposed of by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Rohtak vide order dated 05.12.2022 and therefore, the instant petition has Disposed of, as having become infructuous. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Petitioners ... Respondent against the impugned order dated 26.07.2019 passed by the learned Principal Judge (Family Court), Rohtak vide which the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. qua petitioner No.1 has been dismissed and qua petitioner No.2, it was observed that is entitled for maintenance from both parents and directed the the petitioners submits that the petition under al Judge, Family Court, Rohtak vide order dated 05.12.2022 and therefore, the instant petition has PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.05.28 11:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh