CWP-19252 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (210) Y. Puran Kumar State Information Commissioner CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. the Court. Even, on the last date of hearing, represent the petitioner. 2. requisite inform therefore, nothing survives in the petition 3. for the State, that since the requisite information has already been supplied to the petitioner, is not interested in pursuing the instant writ petition, any longer. 4. prosecution. September 09 Manpreet 19252-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Y. Puran Kumar Versus State Information Commissioner and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI None for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Singh, Addl. AG, Haryana. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, today in the Court. Even, on the last date of hearing, represent the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State, apprises this Court, that all the requisite information has already been supplied to the petitioner therefore, nothing survives in the petition. In view of the specific statement suffered by the learned counsel for the State, that since the requisite information has already been supplied to petitioner, this Court, at this stage, can safely presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the instant writ petition, any longer. Consequently, the instant writ petition is prosecution. September 09, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19252-2023 Date of Decision : 09.09.2025 …Petitioner ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Bhupender Singh, Addl. AG, Haryana. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, today in the Court. Even, on the last date of hearing, no one has caused appearance to Learned counsel for the State, apprises this Court, that all the ation has already been supplied to the petitioner, and In view of the specific statement suffered by the learned counsel for the State, that since the requisite information has already been supplied to this Court, at this stage, can safely presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the instant writ petition, any longer. Consequently, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, today in no one has caused appearance to Learned counsel for the State, apprises this Court, that all the , and In view of the specific statement suffered by the learned counsel for the State, that since the requisite information has already been supplied to this Court, at this stage, can safely presume that the petitioner dismissed for want of MANPREET SINGH 2025.09.11 18:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment