IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 210 Harvinder Singh @ Harwinder Singh Sh. Sandeep Hans, IAS, Deputy Commissioner Hoshiarpur and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondents for not complying the order dated of this Court in CWP Harwinder others” vide which status quo regarding post of Lambardar was ordered to be maintained that the said order has been violated inasmuch as t has appointed the respondent No.3 to the post of Lambardar vide order dated 22.10.2013. COCP-2162-2022 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2162 of 2022 Date of decision : Harvinder Singh @ Harwinder Singh Versus Sandeep Hans, IAS, Deputy Commissioner Hoshiarpur and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Neha Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for not complying the order dated 12.2.2020 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co of this Court in CWP-1343-2019 titled as “ Harwinder Singh vs. Financial Commissioner (Appeals), Punjab and others” vide which status quo regarding post of Lambardar was ordered to be maintained. It is the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that the said order has been violated inasmuch as t has appointed the respondent No.3 to the post of Lambardar vide order dated 22.10.2013. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2162 of 2022 (O & M) Date of decision :-22.09.2025 …..Petitioner Sandeep Hans, IAS, Deputy Commissioner-cum-Collector, …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for not complying the interim 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench titled as “Harvinder Singh @ Singh vs. Financial Commissioner (Appeals), Punjab and others” vide which status quo regarding post of Lambardar was It is the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that the said order has been violated inasmuch as the respondent No.1 has appointed the respondent No.3 to the post of Lambardar vide VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.24 09.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document of the Short reply dated 28.6.2024 filed by way of affidavit of Smt. Komal Mittal, IAS, Hoshiarpur, District Hoshiarpur, wherein it is averred/pointed out that sanad was issued in the name of Parminder Singh i.e. respondent No.3 vide No.210 dated 15.1.2019 and the order of status quo has been passed by this Court on 12.2.2020. It is submitted that violation of the said order dated 12.2.2020 has been made out against the respondents. said submissions of learned counsel for submissions made by learned counsel for the State, the present contempt petition stands September Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-2162-2022 (O & M) Learned counsel for the respondents refers to para 4 (iii) of the Short reply dated 28.6.2024 filed by way of affidavit of Smt. Komal Mittal, IAS, Deputy Commissioner Hoshiarpur, District Hoshiarpur, wherein it is averred/pointed out that anad was issued in the name of Parminder Singh i.e. respondent No.3 vide No.210 dated 15.1.2019 and the order of status quo has been by this Court on 12.2.2020. It is submitted that violation of the said order dated 12.2.2020 has been made out against the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to dispute the said submissions of learned counsel for the State. Heard. Keeping in view the facts noted above and the submissions made by learned counsel for the State, the present contempt petition stands dismissed. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. September 22, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 Learned counsel for the respondents refers to para 4 (iii) of the Short reply dated 28.6.2024 filed by way of affidavit of Smt. Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Collector, Hoshiarpur, District Hoshiarpur, wherein it is averred/pointed out that anad was issued in the name of Parminder Singh i.e. respondent No.3 vide No.210 dated 15.1.2019 and the order of status quo has been by this Court on 12.2.2020. It is submitted that accordingly no violation of the said order dated 12.2.2020 has been made out against Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to dispute the the State. Keeping in view the facts noted above and the submissions made by learned counsel for the State, the present Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.24 09.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document