Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8083 (ALL)

CHANDRA PRAKSH SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/931/2025 · 2025-04-23

Nand Prabha Shukla, Siddharth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:62686-DB Court No. - 47 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 931 of 2025 Petitioner :- Chandra Praksh Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kiran Tiwari,Mahesh Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- Bhole Ram,Diptiman Singh,G.A. Hon'ble Siddharth,J. Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned cousnel for the respondents and learned AGA for the State respondents. 2. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the FIR dated 14.11.2024 in case no.- 198/2024, under Section 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station- Bah, District-Agra and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance of impugned First Information Report. 3. There are allegations against the petitioner that he has forged the share certificates of the company in dispute. 4. Sri Diptiman Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 submits that there is no provision in the Companies Act to probe allegations of forgery. It is for the police to investigate the same. 5. This writ petition is disposed of directing that in case the investigation has not been concluded by the investigating officer till date, the same shall be concluded within period of 60 days. In case, the petitioner has not been arrested, he shall not be arrested till the conclusion of the investigation proceedings in the aforesaid case. 6. In case the petitioner does not cooperates in the investigation, it shall be open for the respondent no. 4 to file a recall application of this order. Order Date :- 24.4.2025 Nisha Digitally signed by :- nisha kumari High Court of Judicature at Allahabad