Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80801 (PNJ)

AJAY KUMAR v. UNION TERROTORY, CHANDIGARH

CRM-M/38340/2025 · 2025-09-17

Yashvir Singh Rathor

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-38340-2025 - 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 213 CRM-M-38340-2025 Date of decision: 17.09.2025 AJAY KUMAR ....Petitioner Versus UNION TERROTORY CHANDIGARH ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Mr. Vivek Kathuria, Advocate and Mr. Rajat Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Balram Singh, Additional PP, UT, Chandigarh. YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR. J.(Oral) 1. Prayer in this petition under Section 482 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.92 dated 18.06.2025, under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 324(4), 333, 351(2) BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station West, Sector 11, Chandigarh. 2. Today, on instructions from HC Parveen Kumar, learned State counsel has informed this Court that the petitioner has joined the investigation, in compliance of the order dated 21.07.2025 and is no longer required for further investigation. 3. In view of the aforesaid, the order dated 21.07.2025, whereby the petitioner was granted interim anticipatory bail, is hereby made absolute. AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.09.17 19:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CRM-M-38340-2025 - 2- However, he shall continue to join investigation, if and so required by the Investigating Officer. 4. Disposed of. 5. Pending misc application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) 17.09.2025 JUDGE amandeep Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.09.17 19:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment