Crl.O.P.No.20934 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :08.09.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.No.20934 of 2025 K.R.Thuraisamy ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by Inspector of Police, Moolanur Police Station, Tiruppur District. (Crime No.223 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the event of his arrest by the respondent in Crime Number 223 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.Karthik Raja For Respondent : Mr.Udaya Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ********** O R D E R The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 296(b), 126(2), 118(1), 109 and 324(4) of BNS, in Crime No.223 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant, 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.20934 of 2025 along with the Advocates Bar President and Secretary, influenced the police and lodged a false complaint against him, alleging that the de-facto complainant had sustained serious injuries and was admitted to the hospital. The de-facto complainant who initiated the quarrel and abused the petitioner using filthy language. Hence, the case. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he has no way connected with the alleged occurrence and he has been falsely implicated in this case. However, the learned counsel, on instructions, further submits that the petitioner, without prejudice to his rights, is ready to deposit some amount to the credit of the crime number as imposed by this Court. Hence, the learned counsel prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that, due to a wordy quarrel, the de-facto complainant sustained injuries and was admitted in hospital. He further submitted that no previous case is pending against the petitioner. However, he opposed for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.20934 of 2025 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and that the petitioner on his own volition, is ready to deposit some amount to the credit of the crime number, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) to the credit of Crime No.223 of 2025, within a period of fifteen (15) days and on such deposit, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Dharapuram on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a)the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) to the credit of Crime No.223 of 2025 before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days and the de- facto complainant is permitted to withdraw the said 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.20934 of 2025 deposited amount on proper identification and acknowledgment. (b)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (c)the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police every Saturday at 10.30 a.m for a period of eight weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; (d)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (e)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; (f)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (g)If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.20934 of 2025 08.09.2025 nvi Note : 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To 1. Inspector of Police, Moolanur Police Station, Tiruppur District. 2.The Judicial Magistrate, Dharapuram 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. T.V.THAMILSELVI,J. nvi 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.20934 of 2025 Crl.O.P.No.20934 of 2025 08.09.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis