1 ( 2023:HHC:9703 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 137 of 2022 Decided on: 04.06.2025 Joginder Singh ...…..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …..Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Mr. Navlesh Verma, Mr. Sushant Keprate, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General. Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge ( Oral ) Heard. 2. It is not in dispute that as regards the compliance of judgment rendered by this court, the respondents have granted due and admissible benefits to the petitioner in terms of the judgment in CWPOA No. 6624 of 2019 titled Daulat Ram and others versus State of H.P. and others, which otherwise formed the basis of the judgment sought to be executed. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes 2 ( 2023:HHC:9703 ) 3. Once that be so, obviously, the instant petition can conveniently be disposed of as fully satisfied. Ordered accordingly. As regards the claim of the petitioner for grant of pension from an anterior date, he is at liberty to agitate the claim before the Competent Authority/ Competent Court of law. 4. Pending application(s) if any, also stands disposed of. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sushil Kukreja) Judge 04th June, 2025. (yogesh)