Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80772 (PNJ)

M/S FATEHGARH TRANSPORT COMPANY REGD. AND ANOTHER v. JASPREET SINGH AND OTHERS

COCP/3524/2025 · 2025-09-03

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 108 M/s Fatehgarh Transport Company and another Sh. Jaspreet Singh, State Transport Commissioner, Punjab and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings order dated of this Court in CWP Company and another vs. State of Punjab and others petition was disposed of on the basis of statement made by learned counsel f dated 09.09.2024 (Annexure P pending consideration with the authorities concerned, appropriate speaking order on the same will be passed within a period of 08 COCP-3524-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3524 of 2025 Date of decision : M/s Fatehgarh Transport Company and another Versus Sh. Jaspreet Singh, State Transport Commissioner, Punjab and CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Rajiv Khurana, Advocate (through VC) and Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, Advocate with Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent order dated 04.3.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co of this Court in CWP-5970-2025 titled as “ Company and another vs. State of Punjab and others petition was disposed of on the basis of statement made by learned counsel for the State to the effect that dated 09.09.2024 (Annexure P-12) has been received and is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, appropriate speaking order on the same will be passed within a period of 08 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3524 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-03.09.2025 M/s Fatehgarh Transport Company and another …..Petitioners Sh. Jaspreet Singh, State Transport Commissioner, Punjab and …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Rajiv Khurana, Advocate (through VC) and Ashutosh Mishra, Advocate with Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt against the respondents for not complying the 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench titled as “M/s Fatehgarh Transport Company and another vs. State of Punjab and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of on the basis of statement made by learned or the State to the effect that “…in case, the legal notice 12) has been received and is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, appropriate speaking order on the same will be passed within a period of 08 VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.03 20.53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document weeks by giving due opportunity of hearing not only to the petitioners but to the beneficiary of the transfer of the permit, from the date of receipt of copy of this order.” necessary compliance has been 15.7.2025 present petition. the learned counsel for the respondent thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner(s). Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper passed in the present petition, the same is aforesaid Order September 0 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-3524-2025 (O & M) ks by giving due opportunity of hearing not only to the petitioners but to the beneficiary of the transfer of the permit, from the date of receipt of copy of this order.” Learned counsel for the respondent necessary compliance has been made, while passing 15.7.2025 by the respondent-authority; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. Copy of the aforesaid order dated the learned counsel for the respondent-State is taken on record. Copy of is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner(s). Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is The petitioners would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid Order dated 15.7.2025 as per law, if so advised. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. September 03, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 ks by giving due opportunity of hearing not only to the petitioners but to the beneficiary of the transfer of the permit, from the date of Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that made, while passing an Order dated ; thus, no cause survives in the Copy of the aforesaid order dated 15.7.2025 produced by State is taken on record. Copy of is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner(s). Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper-book. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is disposed of accordingly. would be at liberty to challenge the dated 15.7.2025 as per law, if so advised. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.03 20.53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document