Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80770 (KAR)

DR EKTA SINGH v. DR RAJEEV GIRI

WP/13530/2023 · 2025-07-23

Lalitha Kanneganti

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28068 WP No. 13530 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 13530 OF 2023 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: DR. EKTA SINGH D/O D.V.SINGH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS RESIDING AT D-107 SRINIDHI THE CENTRAL PARK, 14-A CROSS, BRINDAVAN LAYOUT LB SHASTRY NAGAR BENGALURU -560 017 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KUMARA SWAMY M.C., ADVOCATE- ABSENT) AND: DR.RAJEEV GIRI S/O JAYDEV GIRI AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS RESIDING AT FLAT NO.D 006 CASA ANSAL APARTMENT B.G.ROAD, NEAR GOPALAN MALL J.P.NAGAR, 3RD PHASE BANGALORE-560 078 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.GOWTHAM RAGHUNATH, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE PRINCIPAL FAMILY JUDGE TO CONSIDER REVIEW PETITION NO.1/2023 IN THE ORDERS PASSED ON 3.3.2022 IN G AND WC NO. 128 OF 2018 EXPEDITIOUSLY VIDE ANNEXURE-A IN THE INTEREST AND WELFARE OF MINOR CHILD AND PETITIONER AND TO PROTECT THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS UNDER ARTICLE 14, 19 AND 21. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28068 WP No. 13530 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER This Writ Petition is filed seeking direction to the Principal Judge, Family Court to consider the Review Petition No.1/2023 on the orders passed on 03.03.2022 in G. & W.C. No.128/2018 expeditiously. 2. This petition is filed in the year 2023 seeking an expeditious disposal. Thereafter, on two occasions, this matter was listed and on the two occasions, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to listed under the caption 'dismissal' for today. 3. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. 4. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24