APHC010085012018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 3858/2018 Between: 1. P.MAHBOOB BASHA, S/O NAZEER, AGE 41 YEARS, DESIGNATION. COMMITTE SECRETARY, OCC. CONTRACT LABOUR (APSCDCL), R/O D.NO. 7/31-B2-A, BHAGYA NAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINORITY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, A.P. STATE WAQF BOARD, OFFICE AT 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, IMDADA GHAR, WAQF COMPLEX, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE D R OCUMDISTRICT WAQF OFFICER, ANANTHAPUR. 4. THE INSPECTOR, WAQF, COLLECTORATE BUILDING, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 5. BILLWA MASTHAN, S/O. VANNOR SAAB, DOOR NO.18/961-A, TILAK NAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 6. ABDUL RAHMAN, S/O. S.MOHAMMED SAAB, D.NO.6/1376, SJP HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the respondent No.4 in interfereing with the official duties of the petitioner and restraining to perform and participate in the official duty of the petitioner as a Secretary in the Managing Committee as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the proceedings dt.20.11.2017 issued by the respondent No.2, consequently direct the respondent No.2 and 3 to take necessary action against the respondnet No.4 for his wilful and deter-mental actions of interference in, the affairs of the petitoner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.4 not to interfere in the official duties of the petitioner concerning the activity of the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition and pas Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE (AP) 2. MOHAMMED GAYASUDDIN The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous. 2. Recording the submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 03.04.2025 TVN 121 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.3858 OF 2018 Date : 03.04.2025 TVN