Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80765 (KAR)

SRI RAJASHEKARA v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

MSA/72/2025 · 2025-11-26

M G Uma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49115 MSA No. 72 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 72 OF 2025 (LA) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAJASHEKARA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O LATE RUDREGOWDA R/AT BANADAHALLI VILLAGE KARAGADA POST, BELUR TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 115. 2. SRI. SADASHIVA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O LATE RUDREGOWDA R/AT BANADAHALLI VILLAGE KARAGADA POST, BELUR TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT 573 1152. 3. SRI. CHANDREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS S/O LATE RUDREGOWDA R/AT BANADAHALLI VILLAGE KARAGADA POST, BELUR TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 115 4. SMT. NAGARATHNA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS D/O LATE RUDREGOWDA R/AT BANADAHALLI VILLAGE KARAGADA POST, BELUR TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 115. 5. SRI. UMESHA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS S/O LATE RUDREGOWDA R/AT BANADAHALLI VILLAGE KARAGADA POST, BELUR TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 115. Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49115 MSA No. 72 of 2025 6. SMT. CHANDRAMMA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS W/O LATE CHANNEGOWDA R/AT BANADAHALLI VILLAGE KARAGADA POST, BELUR TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 115. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI: YASHWANTH C.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER H.R.P.-2 OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASSAN DISTRICT HASSAN - 573 201. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASSAN DISTRICT HASSAN - 573 201. 3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KAVERI NEERAVARI NIGAMA YAGACHI PROJECT, BELUR HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 115. …RESPONDENTS THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.54(2) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 7.08.2024 PASSED ON IA NO.I IN LAC(APPEAL) NO.26/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN, DISMISSING IA NO.1 FILED UNDER SECTION 5 OF THE LIMITATION ACT, CONSEQUENTLY DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 6.12.2004 PASSED IN LAC.50/1997 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN) HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FILED UNDER SEC 18(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT. THIS MSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49115 MSA No. 72 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants submits that he has complied with all the office objections, except payment of Court fee. He submits that the appellants could not arrange for payment of Court fee. 2. As per office note, the Court fee as required to be paid is not paid. The appeal is listed for fifth time for compliance of office objections. 3. The order sheet dated 19.11.2025 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the appellants prays for time. The appeal is listed for compliance of office objections for fourth time. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. Learned counsel for the appellants undertakes to comply with all the office objections before next date of hearing. A week's time is granted to comply with the same. List finally as a last chance, on 26.11.2025." - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49115 MSA No. 72 of 2025 4. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objection. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE *bgn/- CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9