116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8080-2025 DECIDED ON: 28.07.2025 ROHIT DHURIA AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Saurav Gumbal, Advocate for Mr. Karan Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab. **** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India for directing the official respondents No. 2 to 4 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner from private respondents, i.e., Respondent No. 5 to 11 as they are extending threats and have repeatedly violated the stay order passed by the Hon'ble court below, by forcibly entering the property, damaging crops, attempted to take possession, and further threatening to dispossess the petitioners. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant case with liberty to take alternate remedies available as per law. Allowed as prayed for. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty afore-said. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 28.07.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No Anuradha 2025.07.28 22:41 I agree to specified portions of this document