Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8074 (MAD)

Taseen Taj and 3 others v. Thirumathi P.Amudha, I.A.S., and 4 others

CONT P/1147/2025 · 2026-07-10

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont.P.No.1147 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.07.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Contempt Petition No.1147 of 2025 and Sub Application Nos.655 to 658 of 2025 1.Taseen Taj No.138, Anna Nagar, Mathigiri Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 2.Siraj Khan No.138, Anna Nagar, Mathigiri Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 3.Salman Khan No.138, Anna Nagar, Mathigiri Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 4.Fouziya Khanum No.138, Anna Nagar, Mathigiri Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Petitioners Vs ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.1147 of 2025 1.P.Amudha, I.A.S., The Principal Secretary and Commissioner of Land Administration, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 2.K.M.Sarayu, I.A.S., The District Collector, Krishnagiri District. 3.Shadhanaikural, I.A.S., The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District. 4.R.A.Priyanga, I.A.S., The Sub-Collector, Hosur Taluk, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. 5.M.Chinnasamy, The Tahsildar, Hosur Taluk, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for willfully disobeying the order of this Court passed in W.A.No.2222 of 2024, dated 25.07.2024. For Petitioners: Ms.R.Lakshmi Priya for Mr.T.M.Hariharan For Respondents: Mr.K.Kumaran Government Pleader ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.1147 of 2025 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by G.Arul Murugan, J.) This contempt petition is filed alleging non-compliance of the order dated 25.07.2024 passed in W.A.No.2222 of 2024. 2. It is submitted on either side that the State has preferred an appeal as against the order dated 25.07.2024 passed by this Court before the Hon’ble Supreme Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court, vide order dated 12.5.2026 in SLP (C) No.16378 of 2025, has stayed the order of this Court. 3. In view of the above, the contempt petition is closed with liberty to the petitioners to re-open the contempt petition, after the disposal of SLP, if so advised. Consequently, connected sub applications are also closed. No costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 10.07.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.1147 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN, J. bbr Contempt Petition No.1147 of 2025 10.07.2026 ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis