- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54635 WP No. 35576 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.35576 OF 2025 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN: HABIB SHARIEF S/O. MAHABOOB SHARIEF AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RMS FRUITS COMPANY, M G STALL NO.1, FRUITS MARKET SUB YARD NEW SAYAJJI RAO ROAD, RMC CIRCLE, MYSURU-570001. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. D. SUDHA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI M. CHAMARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KARNATAKA STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED REGISTERED OFFICE AT KAVERI BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560009. 2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (V), 400 K V, KADAKOL PROJECT, KPTCL, FTS PREMISES, N.R. MOHALLA, MYSURU-570007. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (V) 400 K V, KADAKOL PROJECT, KPTCL, FTS PREMISES, N.R. MOHALLA, MYSURU-570007. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI H.V. DEVARAJA, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54635 WP No. 35576 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED REJECTION LETTER DATED 27-10-2025 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-F AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE MARKING FOR TOWER ERECTION IN SY.NO.128/1A OF DODDAKATOORU VILLAGE, MYSURU TALUK AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER Sri H.V. Devaraju, learned counsel is directed to accept notice for the respondents. 2. Sri H.V. Devaraju, learned counsel has filed a memo stating that the proceedings have been initiated under Section 16(1) of the Indian Telegraph Act 1885 for removal of abstraction and the same is pending in ITA.No.69/2025 before the District Magistrate, Mysuru and the permission by the District Magistrate, Mysuru has not yet been accorded. 3. The said memo is taken on record. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54635 WP No. 35576 of 2025 4. Petitioner’s counsel submits that till the according of permission in accordance with law, no coercive steps to be taken. 5. Since the submission of the petitioner’s counsel seems to be fair, the respondents are directed not to take any coercive steps, until due process of law. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA AT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8