Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80703 (KAR)

V NARAYANAMMA v. KUNDAVARAM BHAGYAVATHI

MFA/88/2023 · 2025-08-14

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31524 MFA No. 88 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 88 OF 2023 (MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. V NARAYANAMMA W/O LATE M MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT NEAR WATER TANK ROAD, PAVAGADA TOWN-561202. APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHANTHARAJ K.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) V/O DATED 02.11.2023, NOTICE TO R1 IS D/E O MAHESH FOR R2 AND: 1. KUNDAVARAM BHAGYAVATHI W/O T.B.S. SAMPATHKUMAR, AGED MAJOR, R/O NO.7-1368-1-10, ELUKU ESTATE, NEAR VARTHA OFFICE, KURNOOL -518467 2. LEGAL CELL TATA AIG INS.CO.LTD. C/O D.NO.4/501, 5TH FLOOR, BUILDING NO.4, INFINITY PART, DINDOSHI, MAJOD (E) MUMBAI-400097. …RESPONDENTS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED.24.07.2018 PASSED IN MVC NO.133/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT, PAVAGADA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31524 MFA No. 88 of 2023 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL JUDGMENT There was no representation on behalf of the appellant on 25.11.2024 and two weeks time was granted for complying with the office objections. Again on 13.06.2025 office objections were not complied and there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Again the matter came up on 01.08.2025, there was no representation and the matter was ordered to be listed for disposal on 07.08.2025. Again on 07.08.2025 the matter was directed to be listed today. Today also there is no representation. It appears that the appellant is not interested to pursue the matter. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE RJ