BAUBI ALIAS VAVI KUMAR AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
NA528/27539/2025 · 2025-09-08
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 80703 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 80703 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 27539 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for applicants, learned A.G.A. for State, Sri Vinay Kumar, learned counsel for informant/opposite party no.4 and Ms. Neha Sonker, learned counsel appearing on behalf of High Court Legal Service Committee/opposite party no.3.
2. The present application has been filed for seeking quashing of charge- sheet no.179 of 2024 dated 21.10.2024 and the entire proceeding of Session Trial No.268 of 2025 (State Vs. Baubi & Others) arising out of Case Crime No.157 of 2024, under sections 74, 78, 352, 351(2) BNS and sections 7/8 POCSO Act, P.S. Pachokhara, District- Firozabad, pending in the court of learned Additional District & Session Judge/Special Judge (POCSO Act), Firozabad.
3. On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned charge-sheet, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned charge-sheet along with entire criminal proceedings of the said case, can be set-aside.
4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused.
5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicants submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection.
6. Be that as it may, without interfering into the merits of the matter, applicant nos.3, 4, 5 and 6 are hereby permitted to appear before learned Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shashi Bhushan Rai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Neha Sonker, Vinay Kumar Baubi Alias Vavi Kumar And 5 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
court concerned through counsel.
7. So far as applicant nos.1 and 2 are concerned, they will surrender before learned court concerned and prefer their bail application for regular bail within three weeks, which shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Till three weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant nos.1 and 2.
8. With the aforesaid direction, the instant application stands disposed of. September 9, 2025 Saif NA528 No. 27539 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad