Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8069 (RAJ)

RAMKESH S/O ARJUN LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2614/2025 · 2025-04-23

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:17214] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2614/2025 Ramkesh S/o Arjun Lal, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Banotha, Police Station Surwal, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 23/04/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0296/2024 registered at Police Station-Mantown, District-Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Sections 108 and 61(2)(a) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The FIR has been lodged about a delay of two and half months. In fact, the deceased was in relationship with the daughter of the accused-petitioner. The daughter of the petitioner was married to Herkesh and when relationship of the deceased and daughter of the petitioner came into knowledge of Herkesh then may be due to defamation, deceased committed suicide and according to the statement [2025:RJ-JP:17214] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2614/2025] recorded under Section 180 of BNS, there is no instigation on the part of the petitioner, who being a father in natural course might have some dialogue with the deceased. The petitioner is behind the Bar since 10.02.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Ramkesh S/o Arjun Lal shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.0296/2024 registered at Police Station-Mantown, District- Sawai Madhopur on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Sunita/22