IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1811 of 2025 ------ Shakib Ansari @ Shakib Firdos, aged about 28 years, son of Kalam Ansari, Resident of Barwa Toli, Chanho P.O.- Tala, P.S.- Chanho, District- Ranchi. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-24-03-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Chanho P.S. Case No.28 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 108/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons abetted the murder of Najia Perween. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the only allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was in love with Najia Perween and the father of the petitioner opposed them. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case as the father of the deceased was opposed to the alleged friendship of the petitioner with the deceased. It is then submitted that the father of the petitioner has since been arrested and the main allegation is against him. It is also submitted that there is no specific overt act attributed to the petitioner that could have led the deceased to commit suicide. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from the date of the order and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-XIV, Ranchi in connection with Chanho P.S. Case No.28 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/