Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80684 (PNJ)

HAALO @ HELU KHATUN v. VED PARKASH AND ANR

FAO/1057/2018 · 2025-09-03

Vikas Bahl

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-1057-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.09.2025 Haalo @ Helu Khatun ...Appellant Versus Ved Parkash and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. J.S. Saneta, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Jaswant Singh, Advocate for Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Advocate for respondent No.1. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant has not approached his office to inform as to whether any cause survives in the present appeal or not and has submitted that the present appeal be disposed of at this stage but liberty be granted to the appellant to revive the same in case any cause survives. 2. Accordingly, the present appeal is disposed of at this stage with liberty aforesaid. 3. Registry is directed to send a copy of the present order to the appellant at the address given in the memo of parties. 03.09.2025 (VIKAS BAHL) Pawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2025.09.03 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document