Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8067 (GAU)

BUDHIRAM DEKA and 5 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM and 2 ORS.

WP(C)/5473/2017 · 2025-02-09

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010279732019 2025:GAU-AS:1358 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C)/5473/2017 BUDHIRAM DEKA and 5 ORS. S/O LT. DHANIRAM KOCH R/O BURNIGAON P.O. BARNIHAT P.S. SONAPUR DIST. KAMURP M A SSAM 2: SRI ATUL DEKA S/OLT. KNOWAR KOCH R/O BURNIGAON P.O. BARNIHAT P.S. SONAPUR DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM 3: SRI ANUP DAS S/O LT. NAREN DAS R/O BURNIHAT P.O. BARNIHAT P.S. SONAPUR DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM 4: RAMESH DEKA S/OLT. KONWAR KOCH R/O BURNIGAON P.O. BARNIHAT P.S. SONAPUR DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM 5: SRI LOBEN ENGTI S/O LT. MARAKUTA INGTI R/O BURNIGAON P.O. BARNIHAT PS. SONAPUR DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM 6: BINANDA BORO S/O LT. PRAFULLA BORO R/O BURNIGAON P.O. BARNIHAT P.S. SONAPUR DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and 2 ORS. REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LR DISPUR Page No.# 2/2 GUWAHATI -6. 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUP METRO DIST. KAMRUP M GUWAHATI 3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER SONAPUR REVENUE CIRCLE SONAPUR DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM PIN - 782402. ------------ Advocate for : MR. S BISWAS Advocate for : MS. M. D. BORAH (GOVT. ADVOCATE) appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM and 2 ORS. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 10.02.2025 Heard Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. A. Bhattacharya, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent no. 1; and Mr. J. Handique, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 2 & 3. Mr. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners do not want to pursue the writ petition at this stage and has, thus, submitted that the writ petition be allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with liberty. JUDGE Comparing Assistant