1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos.6273, 6313 of 2020, 1349, 1458, 2990 & 2991 of 2021 Date of Decision: 24.09.2025 __________________________________________________________________________ 1. CWP No.6273 of 2020 Rajinder Singh ……...Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. …....Respondents 2. CWP No.6313 of 2020 Leela Nand Bali & Ors. ……...Petitioners Versus Union of India & Ors. …....Respondents 3. CWP No.1349 of 2021 Ram Saran & Ors. ……...Petitioners Versus Union of India & Ors. …....Respondents 4. CWP No.1458 of 2021 Brij Lal & Ors. ……...Petitioners Versus Union of India & Ors. …....Respondents 5. CWP No.2990 of 2021 Rahinder Singh ……...Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. …....Respondents 6. CWP No.2991 of 2021 Major Singh & Anr. ……...Petitioners Versus Union of India & Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner(s): Mr. I.D. Bali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Virender Bali, Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP Nos.6313 of 2020, 1349, 1458 and 2991 of 2021. 2 Mr. Vishal Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP Nos.2990 of 2021 and 6273 of 2020. For the respondent(s): Mr. Balram Sharma, DSGI, with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondents-UOI. _______________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the judgments passed by Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in WP(C) No.1951 of 2012, titled as Dev Sharma Vs. Indo Tibetan Border Police & Anr. and in WP(C) No.695 of 2019, titled as Ram Chander Kasanta & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors. 2. Having perused the averments contained in the petition, especially relief clause vis-à-vis judgments passed by Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, this Court finds that case of the petitioners is identical to the aforesaid cases decided by Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. Vide aforesaid judgments, Hon’ble High Court of Delhi has already dealt with all the points raised in the instant petition and as such, respondents can be directed to decide the case of the petitioners in 3 light of the aforesaid judgments rendered by Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. 3. Consequently, in view of the above, the directions contained in the aforesaid judgments rendered by Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in Dev Sharma and Ram Chander Kasanta (supra) are ordered to be made mutatis mutandis applicable in the present case for all intents and purposes. In the aforesaid terms, present petition is disposed of alongwith pending application(s), if any. September 24, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (sunil) Judge