Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80650 (ALL)

MEENAKSHI YADAV v. UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/25062/2025 · 2025-08-20

Avnish Saxena, Saurabh Dwivedi Registrar J Cpc

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:143696-DB Court No. - 39 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25062 of 2025 Petitioner :- Meenakshi Yadav Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jadu Nandan Yadav,Pranvesh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Anurag Sharma,C.S.C.,Fuzail Ahmad Ansari Hon'ble Arindam Sinha,J. Hon'ble Avnish Saxena,J. 1. Mr. Pranvesh, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client applied for National Eligibility-cum- Entrance Test [NEET (UG)]-2025. Initially her uploaded scorecard showed she had obtained total marks 548 and category rank 8327. She also found from information uploaded on the website that another candidate had got less total marks 547 but, got higher category rank 5990. She made complaint over telephone on toll free number. It resulted in her original score card being deleted and another scorecard uploaded showing she had obtained total marks 48. He seeks interference. 2. Mr. Anurag Sharma, learned advocate, Standing Counsel appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2 (State). Mr. Fuzail Ahmad Ansari, learned advocate appears on behalf of respondent no.3 (the testing agency). Mr. Mohan Srivastava, learned advocate Standing Counsel appears on behalf of respondent no.4. 3. Mr. Ansari submits, by aid of artificial intelligence (AI) cases are being made out of change of score cards. He submits, he is carrying instructions and copies of petitioner's Optical Mark Recognition (OMR) and the calculation sheets. He hands up additionally, score card of a candidate who had obtained category rank 8327, alleged by petitioner to have obtained it. Said candidate had obtained total marks 538, less than the candidate, who petitioner alleges had got lower marks but higher rank. 4. Considering the case is of a young person we will not say anything other than requesting Mr. Ansari to hand over petitioner's OMR and calculation sheets to Mr. Pranvesh. 5. The writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 21.8.2025 MN/- (Arindam Sinha,J.) (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAHENDRA NATH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad