[2025:RJ-JP:25560] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 638/2013 Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Having Its Concerned Office At IOCL Marketing Division, E-83, Shastri Nagar, Lohagal Road, Ajmer - 305 006 Through Mr. Yatin Godha, Designation Manager (Retail Sales) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through The Secretary To The Government, Department Of Urban Housing Development & Local Self, Government of Rajasthan, Secretriate, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur; 2. The Divisional Commissioner, Kota Division, Kota; 3. The District Collector, Kota; 4. The Tehsildar-Cum-Anti-Encroachment Officer, Urban Improvement Trust, Kota; 5. Mr. Deepak Gupta Son Of Shri Mahesh Chand Gupta, resident of 440, Gumanpura, Kota (Proprietor Of Shah IOC Filling Station, Kota Road, Kaithoon); 6. The Urban Improvement Trust, Kota Through Its Secretary ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2341/2013 Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Having the Concerned IOCL (Marketing Division) at E-83, Shastri Nagar, Lohagal Road, Ajmer - 305 006 (Rajasthan) Through Mr. Dipak Das, Designation Sr. Divisional Retail Sales Manager, Ajmer Divisional Office ----Petitioner Corporation Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through the Secretary to the Government, Department of Food & Civil Supplies, Secretariat, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur; 2. The Food Commissioner, Department of Food, Civil Supplies & Consumer Matters, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur; 3. The District Collector, Kota, District Kota; 4. The District Supply Officer, Kota; [2025:RJ-JP:25560] (2 of 2) [CW-638/2013] ----Respondents 5. Mr. Deepak Gupta Son Of Shri Mahesh Chand Gupta, resident of 440, Gumanpura, Kota (Proprietor Of Shah IOC Filling Station, Kota Road, Kaithoon) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Suruchi Kasliwal Multani For Respondent(s) : Mr. Lokendra Singh Rao, Dy.GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 10/07/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw these writ petitions. Permission as sought for is granted. Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /201-202