Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:133145 Court No. - 87 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26297 of 2025 Applicant :- Km Arju Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anjali Singh Tomer,Gaurav Singh Tomar,Inder Pal Singh Tomar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Avnish Saxena,J.
1. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant- accused Km. Arju for the offence punishable under Section 123/3(5) B.N.S. in Case Crime No. 304 of 2025, Police Station- Nai Mandi, District Muzaffar Nagar. 2. Learned counsel appears for the applicant and submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in the case by the statement of her sister Km. Akansha. FIR has been lodged by the father of the accused on 17.06.2025 that his daughter Arju (accused) has been abducted by the co-accused Saurabh on
16.06.2025. Later on the statement of Akansha has been recorded by the Investigating Officer, wherein it is recorded that Arju has prepared sikanji and she has taken that shikanji containing some poisonous substances and Arju has left along with co-accused Saurabh. No medical confirming the poison is reported, despite that the accused is in jail since 25.06.2025. The co-accused Saurabh has already been granted bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court. 3. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application and submits that the accused applicant has administered poison to her sister, but no criminal history. 4. This court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 5. The perusal of the record prima facie reveals that initial FIR has been registered against Saurabh for taking away the accused Arju and the FIR has been registered under Section 87 of B.N.S. On the statement of accused's sister that she has been administered some poisonous substance in sikanji, the present applicant has been
arrested. Investigation is continuing. Co-accused Saurabh has already been granted bail. 6. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 7. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs.
State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685]. 8. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. Order Date :- 6.8.2025 Mini (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- MINI KANAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad