IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1682 of 2025 ------ 1. Jagan Hembrom, aged about 55 years, S/o Late Sonalal Hembrom, 2. Birbal Hembrom, aged about 21 years, S/o Jagan Hembrom, 3. Mahabir Hembrom, aged about 32 years, S/o Jagan Hembrom, 4. Jipali Kisku, aged about 51 years, W/o Jagan Hembrom, all are resident of Village Sugnibasha, P.O. Bindapathar, P.S. Bindapathar, District Jamtara (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Pranabesh Kr. Paul, Advocate Mr. Bhaiya V. Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Kumari Rashmi, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-12-03-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Bindapathar P.S. Case No.03 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2)/191(3)/190/115(2)/118(1)/ 118(2)/117(2)/109/352/351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were the members of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of common object of the assembly, attempted to murder the informant and two others. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is also submitted that the alleged injuries sustained are simple in nature. It is then submitted that for the self-same occurrence from the side of the petitioners, petitioner No.1 lodged Bindapathar P.S. Case No.01 of 2025 and as a counter-blast, this false case has been foisted against the petitioners. It is further submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamtara in connection with Bindapathar P.S. Case No.03 of 2025 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/