THE THAPAR POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, PATIALA v. THE PUNJAB STATE BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND OTHERS
LPA/1384/2016 · 2025-07-30
Kuldeep Tiwari, To Be Nominated
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 80598 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 80598 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
LPA-1384-2016 (O&M) and CWP-589-2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
(203)
1. LPA-1384 The Thapar Polytechnic College, Patiala
The Punjab State Board of Technical Education
2. CWP-589 The Thapar Polytechnic College, Patiala
State of Punjab
CORAM:
Present:
2016 (O&M) and 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
1384-2016 (O&M) The Thapar Polytechnic College, Patiala
Versus The Punjab State Board of Technical Education
589-2017 The Thapar Polytechnic College, Patiala
Versus State of Punjab and others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Ranjit Singh Kalra, Advocate and Ms. Mona Yadav, Advocate for the appellant in LPA-1384- for the petitioner in CWP-589-2017.
Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl. AG, Punjab for respondents No.2 and 3 in LPA for respondents No.1 and 3 in CWP
Mr. Anupam Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kawatra, Advocate and Mr. Sukhpal Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1 in LPA-1384 for respondent No.2 in CWP-589
Mr. Inderpal Singh, Advocate for Mr. Nitin Kaushal, Advocate for respondent No.4-AICTE, in both the cases.
Mr. Rajat Khanna, Advocate, Mr. Vijay Pratap Singh, Advocate and Mr. Vishal Saini, Advocate for respondent No.5, in both the cases.
****
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision : 30.07.2025
…Appellant Versus The Punjab State Board of Technical Education and others
...Respondents
…Petitioner Versus
...Respondents ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Ranjit Singh Kalra, Advocate and -2016 and
2017. Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl. AG, Punjab for respondents No.2 and 3 in LPA-1384-2016 and for respondents No.1 and 3 in CWP-589-2017 Mr. Anupam Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kawatra, Advocate and
1384-2016 and 589-2017. Mr. Inderpal Singh, Advocate for AICTE, in both the cases.
Mr. Vijay Pratap Singh, Advocate and for respondent No.5, in both the cases.
1
MANPREET SINGH 2025.08.02 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
LPA-1384-2016 (O&M) and CWP-589-2017 ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA,
1.
this appeal as well as writ petition, with liberty to pursue an application for transfer of recognition to a deemed university.
2.
disputes the entitlement of the appellant/petitioner to seek such transfer.
3.
the issue, as to whether recognition to any othe appellant/petitioner to pursue accordance with law.
4.
5.
July 30, 2025 Manpreet
2016 (O&M) and 2017 ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner prays to withdraw this appeal as well as writ petition, with liberty to pursue an application for transfer of recognition to a deemed university. Sh. Anupam Gupta, learned senior counsel for the respondents disputes the entitlement of the appellant/petitioner to seek such transfer. Be that as it may, at this juncture, we are not as to whether the appellant/petitioner recognition to any other university. It will appellant/petitioner to pursue such application for transfer of recognition accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. Pending all miscellaneous applications also stands disposed of. (
, 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
2 (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner prays to withdraw this appeal as well as writ petition, with liberty to pursue an application for transfer of recognition to a deemed university. earned senior counsel for the respondents disputes the entitlement of the appellant/petitioner to seek such transfer. Be that as it may, at this juncture, we are not inclined to examine the appellant/petitioner, is entitled to seek transfer of t will however be open for the such application for transfer of recognition with liberty as aforesaid. miscellaneous applications also stands disposed of.
(ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA JUDGE (KULDEEP TIWARI)
JUDGE
: Yes/No : Yes/No
2
Learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner prays to withdraw this appeal as well as writ petition, with liberty to pursue an application for earned senior counsel for the respondents inclined to examine to seek transfer of for the in miscellaneous applications also stands disposed of.
ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) ) MANPREET SINGH 2025.08.02 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment