Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80598 (PNJ)

THE THAPAR POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, PATIALA v. THE PUNJAB STATE BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND OTHERS

LPA/1384/2016 · 2025-07-30

Kuldeep Tiwari, To Be Nominated

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

LPA-1384-2016 (O&M) and CWP-589-2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (203) 1. LPA-1384 The Thapar Polytechnic College, Patiala The Punjab State Board of Technical Education 2. CWP-589 The Thapar Polytechnic College, Patiala State of Punjab CORAM: Present: 2016 (O&M) and 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1384-2016 (O&M) The Thapar Polytechnic College, Patiala Versus The Punjab State Board of Technical Education 589-2017 The Thapar Polytechnic College, Patiala Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Ranjit Singh Kalra, Advocate and Ms. Mona Yadav, Advocate for the appellant in LPA-1384- for the petitioner in CWP-589-2017. Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl. AG, Punjab for respondents No.2 and 3 in LPA for respondents No.1 and 3 in CWP Mr. Anupam Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kawatra, Advocate and Mr. Sukhpal Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1 in LPA-1384 for respondent No.2 in CWP-589 Mr. Inderpal Singh, Advocate for Mr. Nitin Kaushal, Advocate for respondent No.4-AICTE, in both the cases. Mr. Rajat Khanna, Advocate, Mr. Vijay Pratap Singh, Advocate and Mr. Vishal Saini, Advocate for respondent No.5, in both the cases. **** 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 30.07.2025 …Appellant Versus The Punjab State Board of Technical Education and others ...Respondents …Petitioner Versus ...Respondents ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Ranjit Singh Kalra, Advocate and -2016 and 2017. Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl. AG, Punjab for respondents No.2 and 3 in LPA-1384-2016 and for respondents No.1 and 3 in CWP-589-2017 Mr. Anupam Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kawatra, Advocate and 1384-2016 and 589-2017. Mr. Inderpal Singh, Advocate for AICTE, in both the cases. Mr. Vijay Pratap Singh, Advocate and for respondent No.5, in both the cases. 1 MANPREET SINGH 2025.08.02 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment LPA-1384-2016 (O&M) and CWP-589-2017 ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, 1. this appeal as well as writ petition, with liberty to pursue an application for transfer of recognition to a deemed university. 2. disputes the entitlement of the appellant/petitioner to seek such transfer. 3. the issue, as to whether recognition to any othe appellant/petitioner to pursue accordance with law. 4. 5. July 30, 2025 Manpreet 2016 (O&M) and 2017 ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner prays to withdraw this appeal as well as writ petition, with liberty to pursue an application for transfer of recognition to a deemed university. Sh. Anupam Gupta, learned senior counsel for the respondents disputes the entitlement of the appellant/petitioner to seek such transfer. Be that as it may, at this juncture, we are not as to whether the appellant/petitioner recognition to any other university. It will appellant/petitioner to pursue such application for transfer of recognition accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. Pending all miscellaneous applications also stands disposed of. ( , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2 (ORAL) Learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner prays to withdraw this appeal as well as writ petition, with liberty to pursue an application for transfer of recognition to a deemed university. earned senior counsel for the respondents disputes the entitlement of the appellant/petitioner to seek such transfer. Be that as it may, at this juncture, we are not inclined to examine the appellant/petitioner, is entitled to seek transfer of t will however be open for the such application for transfer of recognition with liberty as aforesaid. miscellaneous applications also stands disposed of. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA JUDGE (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No 2 Learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner prays to withdraw this appeal as well as writ petition, with liberty to pursue an application for earned senior counsel for the respondents inclined to examine to seek transfer of for the in miscellaneous applications also stands disposed of. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) ) MANPREET SINGH 2025.08.02 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment