273 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA NARINDER SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present:- NAMIT KUMAR, J.(Oral) 1. Cr.P.C. read with Section 483 Cr.P.C. for setting aside the proclamation proceedings issuance of non 19.09.2017 (Annexure P issuance of proclamation (Annexure P by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalandhar in case FIR No.68, dated 19.04.2017 under Sections 498 467, 468, 471, 406, 376, 376 Division No.7, Jalandhar (Annexure P IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-43837 Date of Decision: NARINDER SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB & Anr. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Ankur Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Anup Singh, AAG, Punjab. None for respondent No.2. NAMIT KUMAR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed Cr.P.C. read with Section 483 Cr.P.C. for setting aside the proclamation proceedings initiated against the petitioner including the issuance of non-bailable warrants of arrest issued vide order dated 19.09.2017 (Annexure P-1) and order dated 21.10.2017 directing the issuance of proclamation (Annexure P-2) against the petitioner passed he Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalandhar in case FIR No.68, dated 19.04.2017 under Sections 498-A, 420, 120 467, 468, 471, 406, 376, 376-D, 506 of IPC, 1860 at Police Station Division No.7, Jalandhar (Annexure P-3). IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 43837-2023 Date of Decision: 18.08.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Ankur Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Section 483 Cr.P.C. for setting aside the initiated against the petitioner including the bailable warrants of arrest issued vide order dated 1) and order dated 21.10.2017 directing the 2) against the petitioner passed he Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalandhar in case FIR No.68, dated A, 420, 120-B, 419, 494, 495, 465, D, 506 of IPC, 1860 at Police Station HIMANSHU 2025.08.19 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-43837-2023 -2- 2. On 12.03.2025, the following order was passed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is living at Muscat and he will be coming back to India on 17.03.2025. It is further submitted that the petitioner will join the trial Court proceedings within a period of two weeks after his arrival in India and till then, no coercive steps be taken against him. The petitioner shall surrender before the trial Court within two weeks from the date of his arrival in India i.e. 17.03.2025 and on doing so, he shall be released on interim bail, subject to his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. Adjourned to 18.08.2025.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of the said order, the petitioner has appeared before the trial Court and has been released on bail, he further submits that he has also been discharged vide order dated 14.08.2025. 4. In this view of the matter, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE 18.08.2025 himanshu Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No HIMANSHU 2025.08.19 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document