Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8057 (JHR)

MD JAVED ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY

WPC/1417/2024 · 2025-07-07

Rajesh Shankar

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:18044-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (PIL) No. 1417 of 2024 Md. Javed Ansari, aged about 48 years, son of Md. Razak Ansari, resident of Village – Phatha, P.O. – Dhuraita, P.S. – Hirodih, District – Giridih (Jharkhand) ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Bhavan, P.O+P.S- Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 2. The Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at FFP Building, HEC Admin., P.O+P.S- Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 3. The Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, P.O. + P.S - Ranchi, Dist-Ranchi. 4. The Chairman, Jharkhand State Information Commission, having its office at CTI Colony Sector-4, Birsa Nagar, P.O+P.S- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 5. The Deputy Commissioner, Giridih, having its office at Collectorate, P.O+P.S- Giridih, District- Giridih. 6. The Deputy Development Commissioner, having its office at Collectorate, P.O+P.S- Giridih, District- Giridih. 7. The Sub Divisional Officer, Khorimahua, having its office at Khorimahua Sub-Division, P.O- Rajdhanwar, P.S- Dhanwar, District- Giridih. 8. The Block Development Officer, Jamua, having its office at Jamua Block, P.O+P.S- Jamua, District- Giridih ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Shubham Kumar, Advocate For the State: Mr. Piyush Chitresh, A.C. to A.G. For Resp.No.4/JSIC: Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate --------- 06/Dated: 07.07.2025 M.S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.(Oral) 1. After some argument, counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (M.S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Manoj/Sharda/Cp.2