1 44.WP.1625.25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1625 OF 2025 NITIN DATTATRAY DESHMUKH VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Tukaram Maruti Venjane AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. V.M. Kagne Advocate for Respondents No.5 and 6 : Mr. P.R. Tandle Advocate for Respondents Nos.7 and 8 : Mr. Z.Z. Sayyed and Ms. P.R. Deshpande ... CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATE : 11.03.2025 PER COURT: The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that in spite of he having been sought to be promoted as a special teacher and the Management having forwarded the proposal seeking promotion to respondent No.6 on 09.02.2022, he is not taking any decision. 2. The writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.6 to consider the proposal on its own merits and in accordance with law and take decision under communication to respondents No.7 and 8, if he has not already done that, as expeditiously as possible and in any case within four weeks. (Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) habeeb/ 2025:BHC-AUG:7292-DB