Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80564 (ALL)

HARENDRA KISHOR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

WRIB/2918/2025 · 2025-08-05

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:132842 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 2918 of 2025 Petitioner :- Harendra Kishor Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhirendra Singh,Santosh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard Shri Dhirendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2-State. The Consolidation Officer had ruled against the petitioner by order dated 17.05.1989. The respondent was a Lekhpal in the Consolidation Office. With the collusion of consolidation officials, the respondents got their names entered in the revenue records. The petitioner does not ordinarily reside in district-Mau but stays in district- Kushinagar. However, when the respondents No.3 to 6 started raising constructions, the petitioner became aware of the aforesaid entries and he filed a stay application. Considering the aforesaid facts, the appellate authority is directed to decide the delay condonation application and also the stay application within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order after hearing all necessary parties. In case any party does not cooperate in the proceedings, the appellate authority shall record a finding to this effect and proceed in accordance with law. The appellate authority shall proceed on a day to day basis to ensure that the above stipulated timeline is strictly adhered to. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 6.8.2025 Ashish Tripathi Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad